Wednesday, October 3, 2012


Islamic SUPREMIST and Jihadist supporter/ Journalist arrested with multiple charges. 


Islamic supremacist journalist Mona Eltahawy was arrested last Tuesday and charged with criminal mischief after spray painting a defender of freedom who caught her in the act of vandalizing one of the pro-Israel ads my organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), had placed in the New York subway stations.
AFDI’s ad reads: “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat jihad.” This again proves Islamic supremacist and leftist thugs are dedicated to shutting down free speech. Anti-Israel ads ran all over the country without a murmur of protest; but this pro-Israel ad was hardly up an hour before fascist thugs like Eltahawy went to work to deface it.
At 12:42 p.m. on Tuesday, Sept. 25, Eltahawy tweeted: “Meetings done; pink spray paint time. #ProudSavage #F–kHate.” Shortly thereafter, she was about to spray paint over AFDI’s pro-Israel ad in a subway station when longtime pro-freedom activist and blogger Pamela Hall stood between her and the ad. Eltahawy thereupon sprayed Hall with paint; the vandal was arrested and charged with criminal mischief.
This criminal behavior and fascism was immediately lauded in leftist circles. Eltahawy’s thuggish behavior is a telling indication of how relentlessly opposed the left and Islamic supremacists are to the freedom of speech, and how desperate they are to keep any pro-freedom, anti-jihad message from getting out.
Eltahawy’s behavior is all the more ironic in light of the fact that she was viciously sexually assaulted by “protesters” in Cairo’s Tahrir Square last year and subsequently wrote a searching piece about the misogyny that is inherent in Islamic law. But she was roundly attacked by her fellow Islamic supremacist writers for that article and made a full retreat. Now, in a classic case of Stockholm Syndrome, she is defending the same savages who brutally attacked her in Tahrir Square.
Eltahawy is carrying water for those who advocate a new genocide of the Jews and celebrate the murders of innocent civilians. She sprayed our ad because she objected to the word “savages” being used of Islamic jihadists who murder Israeli civilians and celebrate their murders by passing out candy. Eltahawy describes herself as a “liberal Muslim,” and everyone assumes that that means that she is worlds away from the Muslims who commit such savagery, and only “Islamophobes” would consider them to be in the same camp. But now Eltahawy has retained Jewicidal leftist lawyer Stanley Cohen, who represents the Hamas savages, as her attorney in the criminal case against her for destroying my ad.
Six degrees of separation? This is no degree of separation. Eltahawy hates that I called the jihadis “savages” and then retains the savages’ lawyer. Cohen says: “If I don’t support the politics of political clients, I don’t take the case.” So Eltahawy is a “liberal Muslim” who is outraged that I called jihadi “savages,” and she has a lawyer who supports jihad terror against innocent Israeli civilians, the bloody murder of the Fogel family, the mass murders of Israeli civilians in buses and restaurants, etc.
Cohen said in 2001, “If Osama bin Laden arrived in the United States today and asked me to represent him, sure I’d represent him.” Mona Eltahawy will have to do for now.
Meanwhile, the media are fetishizing the destruction and defacement of our anti-jihad ads. They call our accurate ads “controversial” or “inflammatory” – but they offer no such criticism of the criminals destroying them. This is the morally inverted state of the world. Truth is inflammatory. Destroying private property? Not so much.
The vandalism, of course, validates my ad, yet again. The destroying of our ads is nothing more than criminal activity. In a rational society, it would be looked down upon, but more importantly, the defacement is a metaphor for this entire conversation. Hundreds and hundreds of anti-Israel posters ran all over the country. Not one was defaced. One anti-jihad poster goes up, and it’s defaced within an hour, while its creator faces defamation, smears and libel.
This is a physical manifestation of the entire conversation, or lack thereof. Anyone who speaks about jihad and Shariah is attacked, defamed, destroyed – just like these ads. This is exactly what’s happening in the media regarding jihad coverage in general. Anti-American, anti-Israel, pro-Shariah hate is all over the airwaves, but anyone who dares to speak the truth about Islam and jihad in the media is immediately smeared and defamed. You can’t have this conversation in the media, any more than I can present these pro-Israel ads and receive any semblance of fair treatment.
Then the MTA held a hearing to revise its ad guidelines. I went and spoke up for free speech and was physically menaced by howling, raging, leftist Occupy goons. The media then trumpeted the new guidelines as a restriction of my ads, since they included a provision about rejecting ads that incite to violence.
But my ads don’t incite to violence. I am going to extend the buy in New York, and if the ads are refused, I will sue again. (I’ve already won one free-speech case against the MTA; maybe they want to go for double or nothing.) The MTA may have injected an ambiguous, unconstitutional and thoroughly reckless revision into their ad policy to appease a lawless mob, but it will not stand. It’s the same as it was before. If they block us, we’ll sue again.
I hope that Eltahawy will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and that the NYPD will guard the pro-Israel ads from further leftist/Islamic supremacist vandalism. But whatever happens, I will neversacrifice my freedom so as not to offend savages. And neither should any other American.


unless otherwise indicated this content is copyright protected 2012 by SEA CHANGE, llc.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

If you'd like to help support our site and research , thank you.

Congressional Votes

Here's what going on in the Senate Budget Committee